Amber Sparks

Amber Sparks

You can scroll the shelf using and keys

The Misleading Myth of the Conservative Utopia

May 25, 2010

Great essay by J.C. Hallman on Ayn Rand, Rand Paul, Glenn Beck, and why conservative utopias aren’t really utopias at all:

It’s fashionable at the moment to conflate Glenn Beck, the Tea Party movement, and, now, Rand Paul.  What’s not been discussed so far is the wide range of open religious sentiment apparent in all of these.  Ayn Rand was a famous atheist.  Glenn Beck is a curious and dangerous mélange of talking head and televangelist.  And the Tea Party wants to regard the Constitution as sacred document.

There’s a reason they’re all in bed together.

In In Utopia I make the argument that extreme conservative utopias (everything from Theodore Hertzka’s Freeland to a range of twentieth century novels suggesting that the path to peace runs through holocaust) are not really utopias at all.  Rather, they are reconciliations to an imperfect world.  These “utopias” reject the idea that government or planning of any kind can make the world a better place.  Much better is a policy of not planning, small government, the invisible arm of the market, social Darwinism as nature’s intent, and so forth.  In short, no plan is a better plan.

Read the whole thing here.

Congress Investigating Genetic Testing Companies

May 25, 2010

I say good.  I’m glad to see that Congress is looking into this…there’s no proof that these genetic testing kits work, and while maybe they do, they could also be a huge expensive rip-off taking advantage of people’s worry over disease and death. Which is very not cool.

On My High Horse about Chinese Lit (Again); This Time I Have Company

May 24, 2010 — 4 Comments

A book you need to read. Now.

Friends. We need to talk. I don’t want to sound like a broken record, but why is it that another Mo Yan novel has disappeared from my bookstores and become unavailable on Amazon? Mo Yan is the undisputed literary star of a huge country with a sterling literary tradition with a lifespan that kicks ours in the ass, and he’s like Marquez plus Kafka except funnier and more vulgar and more bizarre. In other words, Mo Yan is an author that tons of indie lit readers and writers should be reading and loving and celebrating and keeping in print and widely available.

AND YET. No one. Will. Read him. I have recommend him so many times, and no one will take me up on these recommendations. No one. Not friends, co-workers, colleagues, writers,  anyone. No one.  If I told people his name was Zizek Smizek and he was Czech or something, I feel like readers would be flocking to him and I’d actually get to read all of his shit which I can’t because most of it has never even been published here because Americans WON’T READ CHINESE LIT. Why? Why is this?

I feel like this is shameful. I really do. Hardly anyone that I encounter–many of them literary beasts proud of being widely read–has even HEARD of Lu Xun, much less read him. Lu Xun. Who is the father of modern Chinese lit and has been called China’s Orwell. What is wrong with us? I can’t even read Su Tong’s last two books because they STILL have not come out in print here. Su Tong is also a literary superstar in China. And elsewhere in the world as well. But not in America. In America, when I recommend Su Tong, I get polite, deafening silence. Crickets chirp. Wind howls.

People. There are Chinese writers you need to read. Not just because you would love them–and you would–but you need to read them because China is a huge, huge country with billions of people and is growing fast and developing faster and is going to be hugely important in the world in every possible way in the very near future. In fact, not in the future–now. So wouldn’t you want to read their Shakespeare, their Orwell, their Kafka, their Beckett, their Faulkner? Wouldn’t you be interested in what Chinese literary history has to say about their culture and values? Wouldn’t you be interested in what modern young Chinese writers have to say about the same? Shouldn’t you be?

Penguin apparently agrees with me. Thank god. Time Magazine agrees with me. Here’s what Jeffrey Wasserstrom has to say about Penguin’s release of a new collection of Lu Xun’s writings, The Real Story of Ah-Qu and Other Tales of China:

It’s a work that has nothing to do with introducing an up-and-coming writer, but rather seeks to widen appreciation of the long-dead Lu Xun — the pen name of Zhou Shuren, who succumbed to tuberculosis in 1936 at the age of 55.

Lu Xun was a towering figure in Chinese letters who deserves to be much more widely read outside his homeland. This affordable volume comprises, over 416 pages, his complete fiction. Julia Lovell’s are arguably the most accessible translations yet of such famous stories as “The Divorce,” “New Year’s Sacrifice” and the eponymous tale of Ah-Q (an opportunistic, inept sometime participant in the 1911 Revolution). Together, they give Lu Xun his best shot to date of achieving renown beyond the Chinese world. If it succeeds in this, the book could be considered the most significant Penguin Classic ever published.

Here’s why I make that grandiose-sounding claim: Lu Xun is critically regarded as the most accomplished modern writer of the most populous nation on earth, and a grasp of his work is thus extremely useful in forming an understanding of much of humanity. In addition to stories, he wrote poetry, an extended history of Chinese literature and hundreds of essays, including small masterpieces like his eloquent 1926 tirade against the warlord government of the time for gunning down unarmed patriotic student protesters. His stories are wide-ranging in style and subject, from the touchingly nostalgic and straightforward “My Old Home” (a poignant look at the gulf that grows over time between two Chinese villagers of different classes) to the fiercely polemical, stylistically experimental “Diary of a Madman” (which offers a crushing indictment of the stultifying effects of Confucianism). Above all, Lu Xun is not just a great writer. He is an essential writer — the kind whose works provide the clues an outsider needs to unlock the cultural code of a nation, and whose work becomes embedded in a nation’s DNA. Herman Melville and Mark Twain are two of America’s great writers, for instance, but only the latter is essential. Foreigners striving to understand the American psyche might find it useful to know about Ahab and the whale, but they must know about Huck Finn and the mystique of the Mississippi River.

So please.  Give Chinese literature a chance. Give it a chance just like you first gave avant-garde  lit a chance, or Eastern European lit a chance, or Russian lit a chance, or Latin American lit a chance, or lit-with-footnotes a chance. I gave it a chance. I knew nothing about Chinese lit when my husband first made me read Mo Yan’s The Garlic Ballards. I was hooked from the third paragraph on.

Next time you’re looking for a book to buy, pick this up. Or this. Or this. Or this. Or this. Just give it a try, and if you hate it, you never have to read another thing. But you won’t. You won’t hate it. I guarantee that. I really, really do.

Best Essay I’ve Read Yet on Tea Party Politics, In Upcoming NYRB

May 18, 2010

Mark Lilla’s analysis is brilliant and goes way beyond the typical media-think on this new phenomenon:

A new strain of populism is metastasizing before our eyes, nourished by the same libertarian impulses that have unsettled American society for half a century now. Anarchistic like the Sixties, selfish like the Eighties, contradicting neither, it is estranged, aimless, and as juvenile as our new century. It appeals to petulant individuals convinced that they can do everything themselves if they are only left alone, and that others are conspiring to keep them from doing just that. This is the one threat that will bring Americans into the streets.

Welcome to the politics of the libertarian mob.

Highly recommended reading.

Matt Taibbi on Sarah Palin’s Smart Idiot Strategy

May 18, 2010

She really is a new kind of “politician” (in quotes because is she? Celebritician?). Matt Taibbi explains how she panders to the worst common denominator, probably because she really is part of her target demographic:

Palin has figured out that this is really all you have to do to win elections in this country — flatter middle Americans’ moronic fantasies about themselves. The great thing about flattery is a) you can’t overdo it as hard as you try, and b) it doesn’t pin you down to messy political positions, controversies, things you can be harassed about by Chris Matthews and other press weasels.

It’s basically a risk-free strategy. You get up on stage and you say, “I’m just like all you idiots. And you idiots rock!” People will fall for this stuff. The ingenious part in Sarah Palin’s case is that she probably genuinely believes it.

Taibbi argues that even Dubya never had the same success with these same methods, because he was too used to the high life despite his cowboy image. Palin, on the other hand, really is of the people–her people.

A Big Basket of Awesome

May 13, 2010

Why a basket? I don’t know. Maybe because it’s freezing-ass cold here in DC, and it’s making me think more of Easter than May Day. But let’s not get too deep into my subconscious mind today. Let’s dig around in our big basket of awesome and see what we come up with.

The always fabulous and talented Ethel Rohan is doing interviews for Dark Sky Magazine. So far, so very good: the first two happen to be two of my favorites, Kyle Minor and Amelia Gray.  In other awesome Ethel-ness–did you know? Ethel is a “hot opener” at the Potomac Review. Day-um. That is pretty impressive. So is her story. So read it here.

One of my favorite favorite lit mags, alice blue, has a new all-fiction issue up with fabulous stories from the likes of Brian Evenson, A.D Jameson, Michael Kimball, and Amelia Gray.

Matt Bell has a great post up on his blog giving us the good news: Dzanc Best of the Web 2010 is finished! I can’t wait to get my hands on a copy of this. Yes yes yes. Congrats to Dzanc and Matt and to guest-editor Kathy Fish and to all the fine folks featured in this year’s edition. There is so much good writing on the web it makes my head vibrate with happiness.

In news of the shallow, the new British P.M.’s wife may be a Tory (or maybe not, actually, I shouldn’t assume) but her style is anything but conservative. In fact, it’s kind of fabulous, and young and fresh, and high-low, and…anyway, nice job, Samantha Cameron. You’re pretty hot.

And speaking of fashion, what’s worse than Obama’s mom jeans? How about whatever-the-hell the prime minister of Japan is wearing (pictured above) here? Seriously. I’m pretty sure I had this exact shirt back in 1990. I guess at least we can be greatful the dude’s not wearing it like I did, tucked into some acid-washed black jeans with the cuffs tight-rolled and a pair of unlaced Eastlands to finish off the ensemble

And please. No one remind me that the 90s are back in style. This is a basket of awesome, not a basket of lukewarm, leftover 90210-flavored puke. Thank you.

Happy Birthday, Pill!

May 5, 2010

Via Bookslut: Erica Jong on the birth control pill’s fiftieth. This is great.

Things You Ought to Know About

April 30, 2010 — 2 Comments

A striking image from Robert's Bone Art series

Francois Robert’s amazing Bone Art series, featuring religious iconography, weapons, and other instruments of violence and war.  It’s devastating stuff.

A fantastic story by Emily Schulz in Fanzine, featuring a woman and her…minotaur. Yes, exactly. How could it NOT be fantastic?

A killer blog called The Big Caption, which takes pics from The Big Picture and gives them choice captions. I could spend hours on this site. (Thanks to Andrew Sullivan for the heads up on this one.)

An oh-so-good story by Jac Jemc in the new issue of Frigg. (Thank you, PANK, for this one.)

New exhibit in my town at the National Gallery that I’ll be checking out ASAP: Allen Ginsberg’s photos of his friends and fellow beats .

And finally: I WANT HER HAIR. (This is really not something you ought to know about, but I just thought I’d throw it in there anyway.) This whole looks actually reminds me of me in, say, early college, and it’s making me very nostalgic.  (Thank god my husband doesn’t read this blog, because if he did he’d be packing his bags right about now. He missed most of the stripey tights phase, though he did know me during the wearing-costumes-I-found-in-the-theatre-wardrobe-discards-bin-as-clothes phase. I still mourn the loss of my Scarecrow pants.)

“This isn’t the Stone Age,” or Sex Discrimination at Walmart

April 29, 2010

Jesus. Liza Featherstone over at the Daily Beast talks to one of the plaintiffs in the Walmart case, and the story she tells isn’t a pretty one:

When Gunter came to work at a Wal-Mart in Riverside, California, in 1996, at the age of 46, with 20 years of retail experience, she was sure she’d advance in the company. A passionate animal lover, she also boasted 30 years of experience raising show dogs. Yet Gunter says she was rejected for the position of pet department head because she “didn’t have enough experience.” The job went (twice) to teenage boys.

During her tenure at the company, Gunter was repeatedly passed over for promotion in favor of men she had trained, she says in court documents. Her bosses didn’t pretend to be running a civilized workplace: Once, after she’d had a fight with her husband, her supervisor suggested, “Why don’t you put your face in my lap and take care of both of our problems?”

Disclosure:  I’m proud to work for the labor union that runs the Wake up Walmart campaign to improve Walmart’s treatment of their employees. And we run that campaign precisely because of stories like these.

Sorry, yuppies. Shopping at Whole Foods doesn’t help world hunger.

April 28, 2010 — 5 Comments

Anyone who knows me very well knows I have next to no tolerance for yuppie bullshit, especially yuppie bullshit regarding food. Including smug, self-satisfied yuppies  shopping at Whole Foods and thinking that buying organic is somehow saving the world. In fact, our own goofy preoccupations with eating fresh, eating local, etc have nothing to do with feeding the world’s poor and actually distract us from that task. Glad to see this article in Foreign Policy address the delusion:

…though it’s certainly a good thing to be thinking about global welfare while chopping our certified organic onions, the hope that we can help others by changing our shopping and eating habits is being wildly oversold to Western consumers. Food has become an elite preoccupation in the West, ironically, just as the most effective ways to address hunger in poor countries have fallen out of fashion.

Helping the world’s poor feed themselves is no longer the rallying cry it once was. Food may be today’s cause célèbre, but in the pampered West, that means trendy causes like making food “sustainable” — in other words, organic, local, and slow. Appealing as that might sound, it is the wrong recipe for helping those who need it the most.

Read the whole thing here.

UPDATE: A friend dropped me a line to let me know the person who wrote this is on the board of Monsanto–not exactly a happy friendly company. So take it with a grain of salt, and know that there are probably ulterior motives behind it. Still, I think the spirit of the article, if not the exact prescriptions, is pretty good.